Introduction
The subject of crime and crime prevention within metro systems
has gained increased attention in recent years. This may be no
surprise, since criminal damages (in direct financial losses,
repair costs, security measures, and loss of passenger revenue)
often exceed the millions. More and more metro companies have
started to look for cost-efficient solutions to counter the threats
of crime and provide passengers with a higher standard of service.
In their efforts to combat crime and insecurity metro companies
and security experts have, however, been handicaped by the limited
availability of theoretical knowledge on this subject. There have
been studies on the possibilities to tackle single crime problems
within the metro (Gaylord & Lester 1994, Sloan-Howitt &
Kelling 1990), studies on crime control in individual metro systems
(Gaylord & Galliher 1991, Webb & Laycock 1992), and studies
on the effectiveness of individual measures (Clarke 1993, Eastman
& Yuan 1994). What has been missing, however, is comparative
research that provides insight into the factors that influence
criminal opportunity within metro systems and a publication that
offers a complete instruction on how to build and manage a system
that limits the opportunity for crime to the extent possible.
To meet this need an international comparative study was started
among twelve metro systems in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and
the United States which has recently resulted in the publication
of a book. This article provides a summary of the book and gives
an overview of the main conclusions.
Read more
|